I have always wondered what gain is achieved by politicians/leaders resigning just after a crisis.
It seems like the easy way out - fail miserably at the job you've been entrusted with, and then when we need to ask you questions about how we ended up in a mess, make loud proclamations of condemnation and outrage, and then announce your resignation, attempting to accrue mileage by looking like a martyr for the cause. Easily done. You won't have to defend your actions or be held responsible.
I'd rather they stayed all in their posts and were hauled over the coals appropriately.
It’s been 6 years and 2 months since I’ve been here
2 months ago
Posts
4 comments:
I totally agree! I would have rather they had been fired, in fact I was hoping they'd be after a few days of grueling questioning.
I always thought it was more a case of their being raked over the coals first and then asked to submit their resignation...
aa
@RainMaker420: That's how we would like it to be. Being asked to submit a resignation would be too polite an approach. Being sacked would be more like it.
totally agree. they should be made to stay and clear up the mess, pro-bono.
Post a Comment